Tuesday, September 1, 2009

B2B - Strategy Tools - Part 19

Strategy implementation - revolution or evolution?

In my previous posts
Employee Alignment with Strategy, Aligning Organisation with Strategy and Culture and Customer Intimacy Organization a lot has been written about change of organisation and alignment with strategy.

But why change a winning team?

No, why do that - if rules and competition stay the same.

We have discussed how the landscape is changing. The market is going from local to global and we are no longer alone with our solutions.That is why we must change - because the rules and competition are changing!

Change means going through phases:















Typically there is a pre-change phase of contentment: Things seem to be ok - one does not even think about change.

When a big change is announced, the first reaction is often one of denial: Why change - and if change, certainly not like this!

Over time - shorter or longer - the mood changes into one of confusion - ok, so we have to change but what does this mean for me?

Through information, consultation, involvement, the new focus starts to show up as results - results that improve the competitive position and the bottom line. The last cyclical phase in change has been achieved: Enlightenment - yes it was right to change and we did it!

Change is not new - change is constant.

But the degree of change has changed.

When will we land on both feet again?

If you want to or need to move forward, you cannot always have both feet on the ground - a jogger at the most has one foot on the ground the other is in the air. Still with a little training she manages to move ahead and stay on track.

To change and move ahead, you have to be dynamic.

PETER SØRENSEN

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

B2B - Strategy Tools - Part 18

Customer Intimacy Organization & Collaboration Culture

"As many employees in Industrial Inc. as possible should know the customers as well as possible.

In continuation of recent years' focus with customer adapted system solutions, maybe we should change the organisation of Industrial Inc. in order for the greatest possible number of employees to get most possible knowledge of their customers' core needs.

Sales, marketing, technical service and R&D employees could be organized in the same department - segment - working towards a selected group of customers. The customers in these segments are working within defined application areas and many of their demands and requirements will therefore be identical.

Working in the same department will facilitate communication between customers, sales, marketing, technical service and R&D, and by focusing on fewer issues, we can gain more customer-oriented competence.

Technical services and product development of customer-adapted solutions will thus be strengthened.

Order booking service, production planning, warehouse and shipping could also be organised in the same department - Logistics - to ensure optimal customer service as regards flexible, efficient and economical handling of the order from receipt to delivery to the customer.

We do not have to wait for the customer to place the order. We shall also closely follow the customers' purchasing rate and contact the customer ourselves about new orders.

In this way the customer will come in closer contact with production planning, warehouse and distribution.

Production, Purchasing and Quality, Health & Safety could be integrated into the same department. Contact persons in the customer-oriented segments will be attached to groups working with products for the segments concerned. The contact persons shall inform the groups about customer demands and requirements in a wider perspective than what appears alone from the daily activities in Production and Purchasing.

The customer will thus also be visible all the way into Production and Purchasing.

If we get a better understanding of the customers, we become better at developing solutions giving increased customer value. Only by continuously increasing the customer value can we be ahead of the competitors by changing the name of the game. By doing this, we will get more and more loyal customers - customers who can provide good earnings and interesting jobs in future."

PETER SØRENSEN

Monday, June 30, 2008

B2B - Strategy Tools - Part 17

Aligning Organization with Strategy and Culture

In their book: " Executing your Strategy: How to break it down & get it done" Morgan, Levitt & Malek describe 4 traditional ways companies organize themselves depending on chosen Strategic Focus
_______________________________________________________________
Technology Focus & Disruptive Innovation Strategy
  • New technologies continue to emerge.
  • Customers are responsive to new products or services that offer unique new solutions.
  • Unique creative skills of key employees are seen as key to success.
  • Examples could be eBay, Amazon.com and other web application based companies.
"Skunk Works" Organization & Cultivation Culture
The Cultivation Culture places a high value on recruiting, retaining, and nurturing highly creative employees to produce unique products.
To conceive, develop and prototype the next disruptive innovation....... (these) companies must create Skunk Works, sometimes also called Tiger teams - semi autonomous mini divisions or true corporate spin-offs that share the parents' high-level goals and can access all of their considerable resources but that have the freedom and flexibility of start-ups. This is done by creating formal or virtual groups that have a respected leader, a simple and highly informal structure, and the financial backing and marketing clout of the large parent organization.

_______________________________________________________________
Customer Focus & Customer Intimacy Strategy
  • Existing technologies are beginning to mature but new technologies do come up.
  • Responsive delivery of customized products or services are required.
  • Strong cross-discipline coordination between employees is seen as key to success.
  • Examples could be custom home builders and some OEM-suppliers.
Strong Matrix Organization & Collaboration Culture
The Collaboration Culture places great value on understanding the unique needs of each customer.
The Strong Matrix Organization promotes the responsiveness and agility that are required for customer intimacy strategies and in fast changing markets. In a strong matrix structure, workers receive primary day-to-day direction from their product line or project managers, with only occasional direction and supervision from functional specialists.
____________________________________________________________
Product Focus & Product Leadership Strategy
  • Improvements primarily come in existing technologies.
  • Customer needs are fairly stable but customers are open to improved solutions.
  • Deep technical expertise is seen as key to success.
  • Examples could be some pharmaceutical firms and makers of standardized manufacturing or testing equipment based on complex technology.
Weak Matrix Organization & Competence Culture
A Competence Culture values technical excellence above all else.
Workers in Weak Matrix Structures are generally assigned to multiple product lines or projects. They receive their primary direction from their functional manger, who helps them mediate among competing demands for their time.

_______________________________________________________________
Function Focus & Operational Excellence Strategy
  • Only a few improvements and mostly in existing technologies.
  • Customer needs are stable and there is little demand for new types of solutions.
  • Operational excellence and control are seen as key to success.
  • Examples could be package delivery companies and insurance firms.
Traditional Hierarchy Organization & Control Culture
A Control Culture values order and security above all else.
The Traditional Hierarchy Organization may avoid the matrix altogether: the additional managerial overhead of coordinating multiple dimensions exceeds the benefits of either a weak or a strong matrix structure.
______________________________________________________________

What is your Strategic Focus, how is your culture and how have you organized your company?
Maybe you should organize differently and "Change the name of the game" - I will describe one such example in a coming post.

PETER SØRENSEN